?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

May. 26th, 2006

Catholics all believe exactly the same thing. There are no feminist Catholics. They all accept every single ruling of the Catholic church.

This may be news to some of us who live in a 95% Catholic country and know plenty of practicing Catholics who use contraception, support gay rights, and are pro-choice, But it's news to the Guardian. And if anyone can see anything but ignorance and anti-Catholicism in paragraphs like this:
However, given that her faith is explicitly anti-abortion and anti-contraception and that its very highest level of priesthood is open only to men, is she really the best-placed person in government to speak up for women's rights?

...then I wish they'd explain it. Now, it does seem that Ruth Kelly is not a liberal Catholic - she's in Opus fucking Dei, after all. However, that doesn't meant that liberal feminist Catholics don't exist - indeed, Kelly considers herself a feminist, despite some possibly noxious personal views on sexual and reproductive issues - and Natalie Hanman's piece is seemingly based on the assumption that they don't, that all Catholics are automatically conservative and that therefore they shouldn't be allowed into any position in which human rights are at stake. That there's no need to examine Kelly's personal beliefs because, as a Catholic, she's automatically a pro-life gay-hating wingnut. I may not be a practicing Catholic, but I know that all Catholics don't believe exactly what the Pope tells them, and I can't express how offensive I find this.

Comments

nwhyte
May. 26th, 2006 10:24 am (UTC)
It's not just the Guardian. This is one issue where otherwise entirely sensible English people often just don't have a clue. (Another example of the same: Oliver Cromwell - good or bad?)
hfnuala
May. 26th, 2006 10:30 am (UTC)
I've actually been told that people make too much of a fuss about what he did in Ireland.

See also, the 'Glorious Revolution' when William of Orange became King bloodlessly as long as you ignore Scotland and Ireland.
nwhyte
May. 26th, 2006 10:49 am (UTC)
Perhaps you saw my debate with Ken MAcLeod last year about the latter?
hfnuala
May. 26th, 2006 11:19 am (UTC)
I remember reading it at the time. I like the way you honestly admitted the context of your views and try to do the same myself.

There's definitelty a left wing myth about UK-exceptionalism versus church benighted Europe, which can be very difficult to discuss because it's such an axiom that having a catholic monarch automatically leads to loads of other social inequalities. I also find it hard to think of the 18th century UK as so wonderful for the common man, even if I do have a weakness for Regency romances :)
daegaer
May. 26th, 2006 11:08 am (UTC)
Oh, come now. Don't you realise that the sort of people statistically more likely to have M(a)c as a prefix on their name aren't, well, really people? I mean, they're practically Johnny Foreigner.

Profile

fat pony like thunder
stellanova
The Monkey Princess

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Cindy S.